Guest
All things went wrong. Someone hacked my home computer - KitKat did you give away my ip address you Kunt? - and maxed out my credit card, my subscription got canceled and my bonus gift of a box of condoms, I had to send back.
Speaking of backs, KitKat - GET ON YOURS YOU FILTHY KUNT!
mac
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 18:45 Back to top
_____________________________________________________________
mac:
No point in your pretending to be me and signing with my username - I'm a subscriber here now so my postings will always carry my name. Your foul mouth will now be reported to the webmaster.
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 22:33
_____________________________________________________________
Guest said
Dear all when we discuss Reality,it is with the understanding that in Scientific terms it does not appear to be solid, it is made up of the infinitely small which does not behave in the way that constitutes the classical physical. We appear to see a stable uniform model which is called the physical. It is not solid it is a mass energetic particles or waves according if they are observed or not. Observation or the role of Consciousness was first discovered in the double slit experiment of 1909 when scientists bombarded electrons at slits in a metal plate expecting to see if the electrons had caused an interference pattern but the result did not pan and they concluded that because there were observers that the active consciounesses had caused an anomaly as it wE called. This appear to show Conscious has great deal to do with the physical. Footnote Scientists now use closed experments so as not let Consciousness to interfere. Quantum physics supports and builds this world, Is it a long shot (to)assume that the Spirit Realm is based on the same principles. As the Indian philosophy everything is Maya.
Long shot or not, we don't have any understanding of the etheric dimensions' sciences. Until we do all is conjecture. As for reality, well I contend what we experience is what makes our reality and not infinitessimally small particles or quantum effects.
Though solid objects in our dimension are known to be made up of particles so tiny we can scarcely conceive of their nature (unless we happen to be particle physicists) they feel solid and totally real - which of course is how they are at the human level. The 'not real' hypothesis could be extrapolated to every single dimension outside that of the total unity, the source, God or however you think of it. Are they not 'real', are they illusions, because they are made up in ways we have no understanding of, sciences we may never comprehend even to the limited degree we understand those found in this dimension?
Or are they all just as real - or just as illusory - as one another?
mac
Posted: 11 Apr 2015 22:03 Back to top
Guest said
maybe the poster will keep these points in mind should they ever return.
Maybe if you didn't have such a know it all attitude, mac, you wouldn't run off every poster in every thread you post in (except me)
- Kitkat
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 00:12 Back to top
Guest said
we don't have any understanding of the etheric dimensions' sciences.
mac
No YOU don't have a clue, mac, there are many, many MANY people who understand parts of the etheric world just becuz you don't doesn't mean NO ONE does.
- Kitkat
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 00:15 Back to top
Kitkat:
Oh dear ... it seems Mister Troll is at it again.
THE 2 POSTS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THIS ONE WERE NOT WRITTEN BY ME.
The Guest poster has signed the name as '- Kitkat' but this is a trolling imposter.
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 07:43 Back to top
mac:
maybe the poster will keep these points in mind should they ever return.
Maybe if you didn't have such a know it all attitude, mac, you wouldn't run off every poster in every thread you post in (except me)
- Kitkat
Oh! You're back! But now pretending to be one of the regulars! Not easy because KK is a subscriber to PN and someone I know from elsewhere anyway. I'm also a subscriber and postings from both of us are shown under our registered names. Just in case anyone else ever views these forums, it's something to keep in mind - anyone posting as 'guest' may be anyone at all and not the name they append.
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 09:07 Back to top
mac:
we don't have any understanding of the etheric dimensions' sciences.
mac
No YOU don't have a clue, mac, there are many, many MANY people who understand parts of the etheric world just becuz you don't doesn't mean NO ONE does.
- Kitkat
"becuz"? And you think that's how KitKat would write? You'll need to try harder at pretending you're someone you're not - whoever you are.
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 09:10 Back to top
mac
Posts:
said
we don't have any understanding of the etheric dimensions' sciences.
mac
No YOU don't have a clue, mac, there are many, many MANY people who understand parts of the etheric world just becuz you don't doesn't mean NO ONE does.
It's not an understanding of (quote) "....parts of the etheric world" that I had referred to. You really should read more carefully and try to understand what I say.... I said - and perhaps you couldn't understand this? - that we don't have any understanding of the etheric dimensions' sciences.
Let me know how I can help you better understand what I write and I'll give it a whirl.
Posted: 19 Apr 2015 11:12 Back to top
Guest
What really gets my teacup is KitKat's going on and on about trolling and she is a FILTHY lesbian! I'm wondering if she may be a less-than-genuine contributor here and her style and lack of response to others' comments reminds me of someone else...MU!! Someone who was around for a time and then disappeared mysteriously...Norman Hutt!
mac
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 15:11 Back to top
Guest said
What really gets my teacup is KitKat's going on and on about trolling and she is a FILTHY lesbian! I'm wondering if she may be a less-than-genuine contributor here and her style and lack of response to others' comments reminds me of someone else...MU!! Someone who was around for a time and then disappeared mysteriously...Norman Hutt!
mac
Why not leave my sexual preferences alone, mac, at least I can spread 'em while you have to wait for the Blue Pills to kick in. What are you, almost 70 lol does your cockie ever cock up on its own? Have you thought about Super Gluing a popsickle stick to the backside of your penis?
-KitKat
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 15:15 Back to top
Guest
mac said
It's not an understanding of (quote) "....parts of the penis world" that I had referred to. You really should read more carefully and try to understand what I say.... I said - and perhaps you couldn't understand this? - that we don't have any understanding of the ejaculative dimensions' sciences.
Let me know how I can help you better understand what I write and I'll give it a whip of cum juice.
You call ME FILTHY?
-KitKat
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 15:17 Back to top
Guest
said
mac wrote:
It's not an understanding of (quote) "....parts of the penis world" that I had referred to. You really should read more carefully and try to understand what I say.... I said - and perhaps you couldn't understand this? - that we don't have any understanding of the ejaculative dimensions' sciences.
Let me know how I can help you better understand what I write and I'll give it a whip of cum juice.
You call ME FILTHY?
-KitKat
Oh dear ... it seems Mister Troll is at it again.
THE 2 POSTS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THIS ONE WERE NOT WRITTEN BY ME BUT BY mac THE TROLL.
The Guest poster has signed the name as '- Kitkat' but this is the trolling imposter aka 'mac'.
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 15:20 Back to top
Guest
said
You call ME FILTHY?
-KitKat
Calling you FILTHY is a misnomer, KitKat. I apologize.
You're a shit4brains New Ager. All this new age/awakening/consciousness/transition horseshit is nothing but an escape clause for crystal-packing hippies like you with an aversion to the real world and all its trials and tribulations.
If you prefer to meditate and herbalise and wear tie-dye ad nauseum, then have at it. I'm going to do my job, feed my ego, and deal with real life in a way that actually has an impact. We'll all be compost 1000 generations removed before any super-duper transition/awakening occurs although I admit the entire vibrations thing is way over my conehead.
mac
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 15:26 Back to top
Guest
What really gets my teacup is KitKat's going on and on about trolling and she is a FILTHY lesbian! I'm wondering if she may be a less-than-genuine contributor here and her style and lack of response to others' comments reminds me of someone else...MU!! Someone who was around for a time and then disappeared mysteriously...Norman Hutt!
mac
mac:
You have been a busy bee recently and not just here. I suppose it's been bottling up inside you and had to come out sometime? TIS a wonder you've held it all together until now.
Posted: 25 Apr 2015 22:41